Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29970/2018bail granted

Rishu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-05-24Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29970 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -494 Year- 2018 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Rishu Kumar, s/o Ram Pravesh Ram, r/o Village- Ward No. 9, Patel Nagar, Ghar Nokha, P.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 24-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No.494 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 379, 411, 420 Indian Penal Code.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not named in the First Information Report. It is mentioned in the impugned order itself that one Abhishek was apprehended with stolen motorcycle and he disclosed the name of this petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29970 of 2018 (2) dt.24-05-2018 2/2 No.494 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T