Roshan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55554 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

Roshan Kumar @ Raushan Kumar S/o Jitendra Chandrabanshi, Resident of Village- Sikariya, Ward No. 36, P.S.- Darigaon, District- Rohtas. 2.

Law Kush Kumar S/o Dadan Bind @ Dadan Ram, Resident of VillageSikariya, Ward No 36, P.S.- Darigaon, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Sasaram Excise P.S. Case No.218 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of 50 litre illicit liquor from the sack tied with the motorcycle which was driven by the petitioners who were apprehended on the spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent, they have committed no offence and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioners have no concern with the alleged seized liquor.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55554 of 2025(3) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 Learned counsel submits that petitioners have never dealt with the business of liquor. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of petitioners. Learned counsel submits that petitioner are young boys aged about 19 and 20 years respectively and are in custody since 25.06.2025, having clean antecedent. He further submits that there is no likelihood of absconding the petitioner or tampering with the evidence and he undertakes to cooperate in the trial.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No.1, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Sasaram Excise P.S. Case No.218 of 2025. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T