Purushotam Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7961 of 2015 ======================================================

1. Purushotam Chaudhary Son of Late Ram Narayan Chaudhary, Resident of Village- Kauriya Raipur, P.S.-Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi. At present elected Member of Panchayat Samiti of Kauriya Raipur Panchayat (West), Block-Napur, District-Sitamarhi.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner Rural Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

3. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

4. The Block Development Officer, Nanpur Block, District- Sitamarhi.

5. The Executive Officer-cum-Secretary Panchayat Samiti, Nanpur, District- Sitamarhi.

6. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Pupari, District- Sitamarhi. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Kumar, Adv . For the Respondent/s : Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath, AAG-3 Mr. Amarendra Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 17-12-2015 Heard Mr. Uday Kumar, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Ray Shivaji Nath, learned Additional Advocate General-3, appearing on behalf of the respondents.

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions

Patna High Court CWJC No.7961 of 2015 (2) dt.17-12-2015 2/2 of law as may be permissible.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) K.C.jha/- U