Dr. Syed Iqbal Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Education Govt. Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2375 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.82 of 2022 ====================================================== Dr. Syed Iqbal Ahmad Son of Late Zobair, Resident of Mohalla - Road No. 02, White House Compound, Police Station - Rampur, District - Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Education Govt. of Bihar Patna.

2.

Sri Deepak Kumar the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, (Higher), Bihar, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar The Secretary, Department of Education, Higher, Bihar, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Dr. Shashi Pratap Sahi, the Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya.

5.

Dr. Shamir Kumara The Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya.

6.

Mr. Indra Kumar Singh The Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya.

7.

Dr. Shujaat Ali Khan The Principal/Professor Incharge of, Mirza Galib Galib College, Gaya.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CIVIL REVIEW No. 197 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.82 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.

Magadh University through its Vice Chancellor, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, P.S.-Magadh University, District-Gaya.

2.

Registrar, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, P.S.-Magadh University, DistrictGaya. 3.

Finance Officer, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, P.S.-Magadh University, District-Gaya.

4.

Finance Adviser, Magadh University, Bodh Gaya, P.S.-Magadh University, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

Patna High Court MJC No.2375 of 2023(6) dt.10-04-2024 2/3 3.

The Director Higher Education, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Dr. Syed Iqbal Ahmad, S/o Late Md. Zobair, R/o Mohalla Road No. 2, White House Compound, P.S.-Rampur, District-Gaya. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 2375 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadaw (GP-23) Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP-23 For the University :

Mr. Amitabh Sohan, Advocate (In CIVIL REVIEW No. 197 of 2023) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Om Prakash Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-04-2024 Heard Mr. Virendra Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Madhaw Prasad Yadaw, learned GP-23 appearing on behalf State and Mr. Amitabh Sohan, learned counsel for the Magadh University. Re: Civil Review No. 197 of 2023.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw the Civil Review No. 197 of 2023.

3. Accordingly, the Civil Review No. 197 of 2023 is dismissed as withdrawn.

Re: MJC No. 2375 of 2023.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner informs that though the substantial amount under different heads of the retiral dues has been paid to the petitioner but the up-to-date interest has not been calculated, the petitioner

Patna High Court MJC No.2375 of 2023(6) dt.10-04-2024 3/3 has not been provided with the calculation chart and the representation of the petitioner has also not been considered and disposed of.

5. Considering the aforesaid information that the substantial amount of retiral dues under different heads has been paid to the petitioner, I am of the opinion that the Finance Officer and the Registrar of the University must ensure to make payment of the remaining amount after calculating the interest and dispose of the representation, which has been filed by the petitioner, which is still pending, so that the petitioner may get satisfied.

6. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U