← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./37152/2018bail granted

Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Sharma v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2018-07-10Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37152 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3030 Year-2009 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Sharma S/o Sri Rajendra Sahrma, R/o Vill.- Aamatari, P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada, At present Mohalla- Uma Das lane, Road No.4, Near 19 No. Rani Rasmani Road, Kolkata. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Jyoti Kumari @ Jyoti W/o Sri Pramod Kumar @ Pramod Sharma D/o Sri Ashok Sharma, R/o Vill.- Bargaon, P.S.- Sirdala, District- Nawada, at presnet Mohalla- Budha Nagar, Street No.2, In the house of Sri Sita Ram Sao, P.S.- Kankarbagh , District- Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manish Kumar No 13 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37152 of 2018(3) dt.10-07-2018 2/2 petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Patna in connection with Complaint case No.3030(c) of 2009, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T