Patna High CourtMJC/1341/2015disposed

Ganesh Prasad Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS

2015-07-28Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1341 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5840 of 2005 =========================================================== Ganesh Prasad Singh, son of Late Sonman Singh, At- Kharia, P.S.- Ayodhyaganj Bazar, District- Katihar.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through its Cabinet Secretary, Mr. A.K. Seth.

2. The Chairman, Railway Board, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi, namely, A.K. Mittal.

3. The General Manager, Eastern Railway, 17, Netaji Subash Road, Kokata (West Bengal), namely, Mr. R.K. Gupta.

4. The Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Eastern Railway, 14, Strand Road, New Koilaghat Building, 3rd Floor, Kolkata (West Bengal), namely, Mr. V.K. Dhaka.

5. The Divisional Security Commissioner, Railway Protection Force, Eastern Railway, Malda (West Bengal), namely, Mr. R. Argal.

6. The Accounts Officer (Pension), Eastern Railway, Asansol (West Bengal), namely, Mr. L.K. Ghosh.

.... .... Opposite Parties.

=========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rana Ishwar Chandra, Advocate. For the Union of India : Dr. Punam Kumari Singh, C.G.C. For the Railway : Mr. T.K.Sinha, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-07-2015 From the instruction issued by the Divisional Security Commissioner, RPF/Eastern Railway, Malda dated 27.07.2015, addressed to Sri Bijay Kumar Sinha, Railway Advocate, Patna it is evident that petitioner is to be allowed the same benefit which has been allowed to his co-worker Sri Ram Naresh Singh i.e. reinstatement, normal retirement on the date of superannuation and

Patna High Court MJC No.1341 of 2015 dt.28-07-2015 2/2 arrears in the light of the said reinstatement, normal retirement shall be paid to the petitioner within a short period.

2. Accordingly, it is directed that necessary monetary benefit to the petitioner be allowed within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order before Divisional Security Commissioner, RPF/Eastern Railway, Malda, failing which the authority concerned shall expose himself to contempt proceeding of this Court.

Contempt Application stands disposed of.

(V.N. Sinha, J) P.K.P.