Mahaboudh Jah Swasthaya Evem Servangin v. The State Of Bihar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19355 of 2021 ====================================================== Mahaboudh Jah Swasthaya Evem Servangin Vikas Kendra 103, Ramalaya Vijay Nagar Rukunpura, Patna through its Secretary Dilip Kumar, aged about 45 years Male, Son of Shri Mohan Sharma, Resident of Village - Khokhari, P.s. - Arwal, District- Arwal.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Chief Executive Officer, Bihar Board of Open Schooling and Examination, Chanakiya Law Collage Compus, Mithapur, Patna. 3.

Senior Executive Officer Pariyojana - 1 Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Principal Secretary Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna. 5.

District Education Officer, Siwan.

6.

District Education Officer, Katihar.

7.

District Education Officer, Madhepura.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Quamar Raza, Advocate Mr. Md. Fazle Karim, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Subash Chandra Mishra, SC-16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 30-06-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

2/4

3/4 After the matter was heard for some time, finding the Court not to be in favour with the submissions made across the Bar, learned counsel for the petitioner, under instructions, states that petitioner shall be content if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the present petition reserving liberty to initiate appropriate proceedings before the appropriate forum and/or take recourse to such other alternative remedies, equally efficacious in law. Permission granted.

We are sure that as and when any such proceedings are initiated, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law.

Needless to add, the authorities/adjudicative body shall pass a reasoned order in accordance with law. Needless to add, period for which the petitioner has been pursuing the matter before this Court, shall be excluded for the purpose of computing limitation.

It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits. All issues are left open.

4/4 The petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) (S. Kumar, J) Amrendra/PKP AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 04.07.2022 Transmission Date