Mosafir Rai @ Musafir Rai v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.28464 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2017 Thana -AURAI District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Mosafir Rai @ Musafir Rai Son of Late Jaganath Rai Resident of Village-Mahesh Bara, P.S. Aurai-District-Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Aurai P.S.Case No.17 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner and the other accused persons if of assault to the informant as well as snatching Rs.22,000/- and there is also allegation of 'Rangdari'. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has no criminal antecedent and the story of the 'Rangdari' has been made to implicate the petitioner in this case and the report, which has been received, does not show any injury to the informant. Further submission is that the petitioner is in custody
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28464 of 2017 (4) dt.04-09-2017 2/3 for about five months.
Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge 4th-cum-A.C.J.M., Muzaffarpur in connection with Aurai P.S.Case No.17 of 2017. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence as well as he will not make any threat to the informant and his family members, otherwise his bail bond shall be cancelled.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court. In the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28464 of 2017 (4) dt.04-09-2017 3/3