Md. Imran Warsi @ Banti v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59306 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-5 Year-2024 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Md. Imran Warsi @ Banti Son of Md. Shamim Warsi Resident of Mohalla - Sahbaj Nagar, Maulanachak, Police Station - Mojahidpur, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Farha Parveen Daughter of Md. Jahangir Alam Resident of Mohalla - Hussainpur, Police Station - Mojahidpur, District - Bhagalpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate Mr. Kshem Sharma, Advocate Ms. Sweety Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP Ms. Anita Kumari Singh, Advocate Mr. Paritosh Parimal, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 20-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 0005 of 2024, instituted under Sections 341, 323, 504, 506, 498A, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioner is of dowrytorture to his wife/informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and the informant herself does not want to lead conjugal life with the petitioner. The allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus. The petitioner has no criminal

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59306 of 2024(4) dt.20-12-2024 2/2 antecedent.

5. On the request of the parties, this matter was sent for mediation between the parties and as per the report of the Mediator, the dispute between the parties has been resolved through the process of mediation. Learned counsels for the parties also submits that both parties have amicably settled the matter.

6. Learned counsel for O.P. No. 2 and learned A.P.P. have no objection to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7. Having heard the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that both parties have amicably settled the matter through the process of mediation, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bhagalpur in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 0005 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) rakhi/- U T