Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6154/2016bail granted

Chhotu Rabidas @ Kumar Gaurav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6154 of 2016 (2) dt.26-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6154 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -454 Year- 2015 Thana -AURANGABAD TOWN DistrictAURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Chhotu Rabidas @ Kumar Gaurav son of Sujeet Kumar @ Sujeet Ram, resident of village- Kamabigha, P.s. Town, District- Aurangabad .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlendra Pd. Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. B.N. Pandey (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 454 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the first information report, during investigation his name transpires as one of the conspirator.

Submission is that main accused Guddu Ram and his father Umesh Ram have already been allowed pre-arrest bail and the petitioner is suffering in custody since 27.12.2015. It is submitted that the informant victim has filed compromise petition also.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6154 of 2016 (2) dt.26-02-2016 execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 454 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T