Uday Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25466 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -275 Year- 2016 Thana -MAKHDUMPUR District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Uday Yadav Son of Late Mishri Yadav, Resident of Village- Najaru Bigha, P.S.- Makhdumpur, District Jehanabad.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Makhdumpur P.S.Case No. 275 of 2016, corresponding to Sessions Trial No. 165/56 of 2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

This is the second attempt on behalf of the petitioner for grant of bail as his prayer for bail was earlier rejected by this Court in Cr.Misc.No. 6907 of 2017, vide order dated 28.3.2017 with an observation that petitioner may renew his prayer forbail after framing of charge.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that charge has been framed in this case (Annexure-2) and petitioner has remained in custody for seven months and except confessional statement there is nothing against him.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25466 of 2017 (2) dt.28-06-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge-V, Jehanabad, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 165/56 of 2017, arising out of Makhdumpur P.S.Case No. 275 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U