Patna High CourtMJC/2719/2015disposed

Usha Devi v. The Union Of Indiathrough The Director General Of Police Central Reserve Police Force, Bihar Patna

2016-03-30Mr. Justice Samarendra Pratap Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2719 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14064 of 2010 =========================================================== Usha Devi, Wife of Late Ramjee Prasad, R/o Naya Tola Sarai Saiyad Ali, P.S. Khaji Mohammedpur, Block Musahri, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Director General of Police, Central Reserve Police Force, Bihar Patna

2. Inspector General of Police, Bihar Sector, Central Reserve Police Force, Patna

3. The Additional Police, Deputy Inspector General, Group Centre, Central Reserve Police Force, Muzaffarpur, Bihar

4. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Welfare, Directorate

5. That Circle Officer, Musahari Block, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D Sanjay, (ADDL. SOC. GEN.) For the U.O.I. : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sharma, C.G.C.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 30-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. A supplementary show cause has been filed by the opposite parties, paragraph 5 of which, which is relevant is quoted hereinbelow:

"That, it is relevant to mention here that on 27.1.2016, vide diary No. PR316001043, the family pension and other legal dues has been paid to the petitioner, thus, the order dated 23/9/13 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 14064/10 is fully complied herewith."

Patna High Court MJC No.2719 of 2015 dt.30-03-2016 2/2 In view of the statement made in paragraph 5 of the supplementary show cause, the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed. However, in case the petitioner has still any grievance, it would be open for him to make representations, which would be duly addressed expeditiously.

This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) Vats/- U