Suhail Kuraishi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25627 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -942 Year- 2016 Thana -SASARAM NAGAR District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Suhail Kuraishi, son of Faruk Quraishi, resident of Village- Bikramganj, P.O. & P.S. Bikramganj, District Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vikramdeo Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Sasaram Nagar (Model) P.S.Case No. 942 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Petitioner is not named in the FIR.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that in another case petitioner has been arrested on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused and he has been remanded in this case and he is in custody for four and a half months and coaccused have been granted bail by co-ordinate Benches of this Court in Cr.Misc.No. 22062 of 2017, vide order dated 8.5.2017 and in Cr.Misc.No.25184 of 2017, vide order dated 29.5.2017. Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25627 of 2017 (3) dt.11-07-2017 2/2 the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram, in connection with Sasaram Nagar (Model) P.S.Case No. 942 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(iv) If active involvement of the petitioner is found in future in such type of cases, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U