Mubarak Hussain @ Md. Mubarak Hussain v. The State Of Bihar Through Basir Ahmad Khan Secretary, Forest Department Govt. Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2244 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3305 of 2014 ====================================================== Mubarak Hussain @ Md. Mubarak Hussain, Son of Late Refakat Hussain Resident of Village - Chainpur Dhaka, P.S. - Dhaka, District - East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through Basir Ahmad Khan, the Principal Secretary, Forest Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. Bashir Ahmad Khan, Chief Conservator of Forest, 4th Floor, Technology Bhawan, Bishwashraiya Parisar, Bailey Road, Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uma Shankar Verma Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra For the Opp. Party/s : Mr. Rana Bhupendra Narain, AC to GP-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 14-10-2015 Mr. Rana Bhupendra Narain, learned Assisting Counsel to Government Pleader No.9 while filing a show cause on behalf of the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest informs that the order of this Court passed in the writ proceedings have been complied and that an order has been passed by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest on 22.6.2015 disposing of the claim of the petitioner.
In the circumstances and as submitted by Mr. Uma Shankar Verma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner this contempt application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, if so advised, to question the order dated 22.6.2015 enclosed at Annexure-B by filing an appropriate application
Patna High Court MJC No.2244 of 2015 (4) dt.14-10-2015 before the appropriate forum.
Mr. Uma Shankar Verma submits that the copy of the order passed by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest has not been communicated to the petitioner. Let the same be communicated to the petitioner by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, if not already communicated. It is further stated by learned counsel that certain documents filed by the petitioner are lying with the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest. The petitioner would be at liberty to make an application before the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest in this regard and which shall be considered and disposed of accordingly.
The contempt application stands disposed of.
(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U