Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26783/2017rejected

Laxman Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-19Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26783 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26783 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Laxman Yadav Son of Late Brijlal Yadav, Resident of Village- Patuaha, P.S.- Saharsa (Sadar), District- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier dismissed on 05.01.2016 vide Cr. Misc. No. 40064 of 2015 as not pressed and again rejected vide order dated 21.09.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 35726 of 2016, on the ground that the trial is not likely to be concluded in near future, the petitioner is suffering in custody since 01.07.2015 and the occurrence has taken place due to land dispute. Learned APP duly assisted by learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner is the assailant and the trial is in progress which is likely to be concluded.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26783 of 2017 (2) dt.19-07-2017 again his prayer for bail stands rejected.

However, learned court below is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order after taking all positive steps, failing which, the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T