Firoj Mian v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66949 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-90 Year-2019 Thana- RAMNAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.

FIROJ MIAN Son of Haroon Mian Resident of Village- Meghwal Mathiya, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran.

2.

Haroon Mian Son of Late Safi Mian Resident of Village- Meghwal Mathiya, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran.

3.

Javinullah Ansari @ Javiullah Mian Son of Haroon Mian Resident of Village- Meghwal Mathiya, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran. 4.

Hedaitullah Ansari @ Hedaitullah Mian Son of Haroon Mian Resident of Village- Meghwal Mathiya, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran. 5.

Hemayatullah Ansari @ Hemayatullah Mian Son of Haroon Mian Resident of Village- Meghwal Mathiya, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran. 6.

Anayullah Ansari @ Analytullah Mian Son of Haroon Mian Resident of Village- Meghwal Mathiya, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Jarar Khan Son of Taiyab Khan Resident of Village- Meghwal Mathiya, P.S.- Ram Nagar, District- West Champaran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kr Singh No. 1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Narendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-03-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The present application has been filed for quashing the order dated 06.10.2021 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Bagaha, West Champaran in S. Tr. No. 88/2020 arising out of Ramnagar P.S. Case No. 90 of 2019 for the offences

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66949 of 2021(3) dt.27-03-2025 2/2 under Sections 147/341/323/307/504 of the Indian Penal Code by which the discharge application of the petitioners have been rejected.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no offence under Sections 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out therefore charges cannot be framed.

4. From the impugned order, it appears that the trial Judge has found that the accused have assaulted the victim on his head with bricks and sticks and therefore, strong prima facie case has been found for framing of charge under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code.

5. I do not find any reason to differ with the same. This application is dismissed.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Saif/- U T