Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53929/2025bail rejected

Aruna Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-25Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53929 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-68 Year-2025 Thana- PASRAHA District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1.

Aruna Devi W/O Khero Muni @ Khiro Muni R/O Vill. - Bhimri, P.S. - Pasraha, Dist.- Khagaria 2.

Khero Muni @ Khiro Muni S/O Ramaswarup Muni @ Swarup Lal Muni R/O Vill. - Bhimri, P.S. - Pasraha, Dist.- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 96, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, kidnapped the daughter of informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, daughter of informant was in love affair with son of these petitioners,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53929 of 2025(4) dt.25-11-2025 2/2 namely Sukbindar Kumar and both of them, out of there own sweet will, ran away from the house. Petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case merely because they happen to be parents of co-accused Sukbindar Kumar. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that they, along with co-accused Sukbindar Kumar, kidnapped the minor daughter of informant who is still traceless.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, gravity of offence and the fact that the victim is still traceless, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T