Sunita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54327 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2025 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Sunita Devi W/o Dinesh Yadav R/o Village - Padhi Karma, Karma, P.S - Nabinagar, District - Aurangabad (Bihar) 2.

Dharmendra Yadav @ Dharmendra Kumar Yadav S/o Dinesh Yadav R/o Village - Padhi Karma, Karma, P.S - Nabinagar, District - Aurangabad, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Rupa Kumari For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 352, 117(2), 109(1), 3(5) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and petitioner no.1 is a woman and husband of the petitioner no.1 is own uncle of the informant and petitioner no.2 is son of petitioner no.1. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to construction of house, the informant alleges that accused persons came and assaulted him by a sharp edged weapon causing injury

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54327 of 2025(2) dt.21-08-2025 2/2 on head.

4. It is next submitted that allegation of assault is not specific, though the injury has been opined to be grievous. It is also submitted that on account of dispute relating to property, an altercation had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other. It is next submitted that petitioners are not criminal.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1, Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P. S. Case No.119 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T