Ramjee Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26085 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -45 Year- 2015 Thana -PIPRA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Ramjee Sahani, son of Shivchandra Sahani, resident of Village- Bediban Madhuabn, P.S.- Pipra, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Karandeep Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 01-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.12.2016 in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 45/2015 for offences punishable under Sections 304-B, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that his daughter Sanju Devi was married to the petitioner 21⁄2 years back. Due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and that the deceased has no child, she has been done to death by her husband and in-laws and her dead body has been made to disappear.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26085 of 2017 (3) dt.01-08-2017 2/3 It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, the mother has filed an affidavit that her daughter had died due to diarrhoea and that charge-sheet has already been submitted, hence, there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence. However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail stating therein that the witnesses have supported the prosecution case.

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari, in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 45/2015, subject to the condition that one of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned police station, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner and that petitioner will appear before the learned court below during trial as and when required and failure to appear on two consecutive dates

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26085 of 2017 (3) dt.01-08-2017 3/3 without assigning any reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/- U T