Patna High CourtCR. MISC./30853/2014bail granted

Vipat Das And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-19Mr. Justice Dinesh Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30853 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -392 Year- 2013 Thana -SAMASTIPUR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSAMASTIPUR ======================================================

1. Vipat Das Son of Late Sahdeo Das

2. Lal Babu Das Son of Vipat Das

3. Sudhan Devi Wife of Lagindra Das

4. Dai Muni Devi Wife of Late Kailash Das

5. Anita Devi Wife of Lal Babu Das

6. Lalti Devi @ Mamta Devi Wife of Lalit Das

7. Punam Devi Wife of Lal Mohan Das

8. Lalan Das Son of Late Lagindra Das All Resident of village- Bhaua, Police Station- Patory, District- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Rajendra Das .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Pd.Nat(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-03-2015 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners, complainant and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a complaint case in which process has been directed to be issued after cognizance being taken for the offences punishable under Sections 379 and 354 of the Indian Penal Code. The accusation is of assaulting the wife of the complainant and stripped. The accused persons also assaulted the complainant.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30853 of 2014 (3) dt.19-03-2015 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accusation is omnibus and general and for the occurrence of 8.3.2013 the complaint was filed on 14.3.2013 when the petitioner side registered Patori P.S. Case No. 32 of 2013 on 23.2.2013 making accusation under sections 341,323,325,379,447 and 504/34 IPC. Statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering the delayed lodging of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Samastipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 392 of 2013 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Anil/- U T