← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53435/2025bail granted

Sudhanshu Kumar Goswami @ Sudhanshu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-19Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53435 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2024 Thana- Safiyasarai District- Munger ====================================================== Sudhanshu Kumar Goswami @ Sudhanshu Kumar S/o- Banipati Goswami Resident of Herudiyara PS- Kasimbazar District-Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anish Chandra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections Section 420, 406, 467, 504, 506 and 34 of IPC .

3 . The prosecution case , in brief, is that this petitioner, who is close friend of the informant, borrowed Rs. 23,00,000/- from him on different dates for the purpose of doing business. When informant demanded the money , he refused to pay . It is further alleged that a Panchayati was also held for the same where petitioner assured to return the aforesaid amount but never returned any money and thus this petitioner cheated the informant.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53435 of 2025(2) dt.19-09-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence . Prior to the present case and for the same aforesaid alleged amount, informant has also filed Money Suit against this petitioner vide Money Suit No. 20 of 2022 i. e ,. Annexure - 5 and 6 to the bail petition . Charge sheet has already been submitted. Petitioner is in custody since 17.06.2025 .

5 . Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case , period of custody and other circumstances of the case , prayer for regular bail of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Munger in connection with Safiyasarai P. S. Case No. 98 of 2024 . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T