Sonu Alam @ Wjeer Alam @ Md Sonu Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65238 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-300 Year-2021 Thana- PARSA District- Saran ====================================================== SONU ALAM @ WJEER ALAM @ MD SONU ALAM Son of Siraj Alam Resident of Village - Bathui, P.S.- Parsa, Distt.- Saran at Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Krishna Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Dashrath Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 30-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Parsa P.S. Case 300/2021, registered for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per prosecution case, there is accusation against the petitioner to have established physical relation with the informant due to which she carries of pregnancy of five months, now he refused to perform marriage.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 05.08.2021 and bears no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65238 of 2021(3) dt.30-08-2022 2/2 with the prosecution evidence.
The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that there is accusation against the petitioner and the same is corroborated by the statement of victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the accusation against the petitioner coupled with the statement of victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Hence, prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected.
However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial as early as possible.
(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T