Dr. Shailendra Mishra v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.20 of 2016 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5057 of 2015 =========================================================== Dr. Shailendra Mishra, Son of Sri Sita Ram Mishra, Resident of Mohalla Naya Bazar, Saharsa, P.S. & District Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sr. G.S. Gangwar, I.A.S.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Khalid Mirza.

4. The Bhupenra Narain Mandal Univesity, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura through its Registrar, namely Sri Kumaresh Prasad Singh.

5. The Vice-Chancellor, the Bhupendra Narain Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura, namely Sri Binod Kumar.

6. The Registrar, the Bhupendra Narain Mandal University, Laloo Nagar, Madhepura, namely Sri Kumaresh Prasad Singh.

7. The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Sanjay Kumar.

8. The Director, Provident Fund, Government of Bihar, Patna, namely Sri Dilip Kumar.

.... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Pranav Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Pandey Sanjay Sahay, S.C.31 For the A.G.

:

Mr. Manikant Mishra, Advocate For the University :

Mr. Manish Dhari Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-07-2016 A cheque dated 02.07.2016 of Rs.26,70,936/- is being handed over to the counsel for the petitioner. The cheque number is '039747'. Let the petitioner give acknowledgment of the receipt of the said cheque.

Counsel for the University informs the Court that the State Auditor is not available in the University for the time being,

Patna High Court MJC No.20 of 2016 dt.13-07-2016 2 / 2 therefore, the final position with regard to the sanction and calculation may vary. Let the process be completed no sooner the Auditor is available.

Contempt application now stands disposed of.

Whatever dispute the petitioner wants to raise, raise it before an appropriate forum with regard to the left over issue in view of the contentious situation emerging from the position taken in the show-filed filed today.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SanjayKumar/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 14.07.2016 Transmission Date