Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31231/2014disposed

Laxman Paswan @ Ram Lakshan Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-13Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31231 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2011 Thana -DAUDNAGAR District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Laxman Paswan @ Ram Lakshan Paswan son of Late Chandrika Paswan

2. Pappu Paswan son of Ram Lakshan Paswan

3. Bir Pratap Paswan, son of Ram Lakshan Paswan

4. Dharmendra Paswan son of Ram Lakshan Paswan All resident of village- Pilchi, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad

5. Ajay Paswan, son of Ram Bachan Paswan

6. Ranjay Paswan son of Ram Bachan Paswan Both resident of Mohalla Patel Nagar, P.S.- Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ashok Swarnkar @ Bhola, Son of Dukhit Prasad Swarnkar, Resident of Patel Nagar, P.S. Daudnagar, District Aurangabad .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Phulendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-09-2017 Heard.

It is submitted that already the trial is at the fag end and out of four charge sheet witnesses, three have been examined. In the present application, order of cognizance dated 24.08.2011, passed by learned S.D.J.M., Daudnagar in Daudnagar P.S. Case No.15 of 2011 has been challenged alleging that the petitioners approached claiming the owner of the land to the informant on which the informant had already built a house and to transfer the land in his name, as per allegation, the informant paid altogether Rs.1,25,000/- in cash.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31231 of 2014 (4) dt.13-09-2017 2 /2 As the trial is at the fag end, the present application has become infructuous, so this quashing application is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioners to raise the grounds in the defence as taken in this application and the court below is directed to conclude the trial expeditiously preferably within a period of three months.

(Arun Kumar, J.) S.Kumar/- U T