Krishan Mandal @ Krishan Kumar @ Krishan Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62226 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2025 Thana- KURSAKANTA District- Araria ====================================================== Krishan Mandal @ Krishan Kumar @ Krishan Kumar Mandal S/o Satyanarayan Mandal R/o vill - Katfar, P.S.- Kursakanta, Distt.- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravindra Nath Dubey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Parmanand Prasad, A.P.P.
For the Informant :
Mr. Kundan Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kursankanta P. S. Case No. 23 of 2025 in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 137(2), 103(1), 238, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
3. As per F.I.R., son of the informant went to his Sasural on motorcycle but later on, his motorcycle was seen lying abandoned by the co-villagers. Informant alleges that some unknown miscreants committed murder of her son.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R and his name transpired during course of investigation. Petitioner has falsely been
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62226 of 2025(3) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 implicated in this case due to village politics. Petitioner is in custody since 24.03.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that on the disclosure of this petitioner, mobile, rope and sack of the deceased were recovered.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and materials collected during investigation, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.
7. However, since petitioner is in custody since 24.03.2025, Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial, preferably, within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T