← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./15073/2016rejected

Ganga Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-19Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15073 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -61 Year- 2015 Thana -MATIHANI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Ganga Singh Son of Late Hari Narayan Singh resident of Village- Sonapur Barat, Police Station- Nayagaon, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh 5 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 61 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, due to not compromising the case, coaccused Daulat Kunwar opened fire upon Krishna Murari Kunwar, brother of the informant and when the mother of the informant came for rescue, then the petitioner and co-accused Rajesh Chaudhary opened fire upon her causing injury to her resulting the mother and brother both fell down and the mother of the informant namely Kiran Devi succumbed to injury. Thereafter, the brother

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15073 of 2016 (3) dt.19-05-2016 2/2 was brought for treatment where he also died. Submission is of false implication and that there is material contradiction in the statement of the informant and other witnesses, the prosecution story appears improbable and unreliable, there is no legal and tangible material against the petitioner, and further there is no specific allegation against him, and without any fault due to previous enmity, the petitioner is suffering in custody since 26.11.2015.

The learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the petitioner is one of the assailant of Kiran Devi, the mother of the informant and two wound of entry were found. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that the petitioner is one of the assailant, as such, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and accordingly his prayer stands rejected in connection with Matihani P.S. Case No. 61 of 2015 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai.

However, let the trial be expedited and concluded preferably within nine months from the date of receipt or production of a copy of this order.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Mishra/- U T