Patna High CourtMJC/2465/2015disposed

S.M.Arif v. The State Of Bihar Through The Sri R.K.Mahajan The Principal Secretary Department Of Education Govt.

2018-01-17The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2465 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17012 of 2012 ====================================================== S.M. Arif, Son of Md. Bashiruddin, resident of Village+P.O.+P.S.- Benipatti, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Sri R.K. Mahajan the Principal Secretary Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. Sri R.K. Mahajan, the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Sridhar Jee, the Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Sri Griwar Dayal Singh, the District Magistrate, Madhubani.

5. Sri Anil Kumar Verma, the District Education Officer, Madhubani.

6. Sri Sanjay Kumar, the District Programme Officer Establishment, Madhubani.

7. Sri Abhay Kumar, the Block Development Officer, Benipatti Block, District- Madhubani.

8. Smt. Meena Kumari, the Block Education Extension Officer, Benipatti Block, District- Madhubani. null null

9. Smt. Daiji Devi, the Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj, Sahpur, Benipatti Block, District- Madhubani.

10. Sri Shivji Prasad Choudhary, the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Sahpur, Benipatti Block, District- Madhubani.

11. Dharmendra Kumar, the Headmaster, Government Primary School, Bisheladugama, Block- Benipatti, District- Madhubani. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Iqbal Asif Niazi, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Md. N. Hoda Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 17-01-2018 From the show cause filed by the respondents, it is seen that the claim of the petitioner has been considered and by a detailed order passed, as contained in Annexure A dated 11.4.2016, his claim has been decided.

That being so, now no further indulgence into the

Patna High Court MJC No.2465 of 2015 (4) dt.17-01-2018 2/2 matter is called for.

In case the petitioner is aggrieved with the manner in which consideration is made and the passed, petitioner shall have liberty to challenge the same afresh in accordance with law. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.jha/- U