← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2648/2024disposed

Sadhna Sharma v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri S. Siddharth, The Additional Chief Secretary,

2026-05-07Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2648 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.224 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Sadhna Sharma wife of Biresh Kumar Resident of Mohalla- Ashok Nagar (Ward No. 40), Pokharia, Police Station- Town, District- Begusarai. 2.

Madhu Kumari wife of Uday Kumar Resident of Ward No. 3, Babhangama, Police Station- Barauni, District- Begusarai. 3.

Kanchan Kumari wife of Sunil Kumar Yadav Resident of Mohalla- V.I.P. Colony, North side of Jamui Block, P.O. and Police Station- Jamui, DistrictJamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri S. Siddharth, the Additional Chief Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Baidhnath Yadav, the Director Secondary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Arbind Kumar, the Regional Deputy Director, Education (Regional Education Officer), Munger Division, Munger.

4.

Sri Raj Deo Ram, the District Education Officer, Begusarai. 5.

Sri Rajesh Kumar, the District Education Officer, Jamui. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kundan Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Government Advocate 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):

"for initiation of contempt proceeding against the contemnors/opposite parties for their willful disobedience of the order dated 04.03.2024 passed in CWJC No. 224 of 2024."

Patna High Court MJC No.2648 of 2024(2) dt.07-05-2026 2/2

3. The show cause of the opposite party shows that the Divisional Commissioner, Munger Division, Munger vide an order dated 25.05.2024 has reinstated the petitioner.

4. Granting liberty to the petitioner to agitate the matter, if any grievance still remains, the present contempt petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U