Sanjay Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31558 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2017 Thana -MANPUR District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Sanjay Yadav

2. Anuj Yadav, both sons of Late Jagdish Yadav, resident of villageChhotaki Dhanuki, PS-Manpur, District-Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudal Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017 registered for the offence(s) under section(s) 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

The petitioners are not named in the FIR and the case is of section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that no specific allegation has been attributed against these petitioners and the main allegation is against co-accused Sunil Yadav and others. Sunil Yadav has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court, vide order dated 11.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 31282 of 2017. Petitioner no. 1 is in custody for more than four months and petitioner no. 2 is in custody for more than three months. Heard learned Additional Public Prosecutor also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31558 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 12 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine rhyme or reasons, the prosecution will have liberty to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Mahesh/- U T