← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56783/2025bail rejected

Akhaya Lal Sah @ Akhaya Lal @ Akhayalal Sah @ Akshay Lal Shah v. The State Of Bihar

2026-02-11Mr. Justice Purnendu Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56783 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1451 Year-2024 Thana- BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Akhaya Lal Sah @ Akhaya Lal @ Akhayalal Sah @ Akshay Lal Shah S/O Late Ram Sakal Sah @ Late Ramsakal Sah Village- Shanti Nagar, Garhani, P.S.- Garhani, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Sah S/O Late Rajendra Prasad @ Rajendra Sah Village- Garhani, P.S.- Garhani, District- Bhojpur ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Diwakar, Advocate For the Informant :

Mr. Raj Narayan Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-02-2026 Heard Mr. Diwakar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner; Mr. Raj Narayan Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant and Mr. Mohammed Arif, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 1451(C) of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the N.I. Act and Sections 420, 323, 341 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Vide order dated 26.11.2025, the matter was referred to Patna High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre for amicable settlement, however, it has been informed that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56783 of 2025(6) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 dispute between the parties could not be resolved through the process of mediation and a report dated 30.01.2026 to that effect has been submitted by the learned Mediator, which has been kept at Flag "M".

4. In view of the subsequent development and the seriousness of the offence committed by the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on pre-arrest bail.

5. However, the petitioner, if so advised, may avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

6. Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T