← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18317/2016bail granted

Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-03Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18317 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2015 Thana -PARBATTA District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Kumar Yadav Son of Sri Yadu Nandan Pd. Yadav R/o Vill Shiv Nandanpur, PS Sultanganj, Dist Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Neeraj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsing Tanti (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 03-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No.15 of 2015, registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 25(1-b) of the Arms Act.

The police raided the house of one Nage Mahto, from there stolen Sumo Victa and motor cycle were recovered. The petitioner also apprehended from there and from his possession one country made pistol was recover.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the possession of the petitioner only a country made pistol was recovered and the petitioner is in jail since 4.4.2015.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18317 of 2016 (2) dt.03-05-2016 2/2 Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner-Gautam Kumar @ Gautam Kumar Yadav be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the A.C.J.M. Naugachia, in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No.15 of 2015 subject to the conditions that:- (i) one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner;

(ii) if the petitioner is found involved in similar type of case in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the Court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and;

(iii) that the petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U