Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18910/2016bail granted

Rajan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2016-08-10Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18910 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2015 Thana -GARKHA District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Rajan Singh, son of Satrudhan Singh, resident of Village- Motirajpur, P.S. Garkha, Distt- Saran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Nr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2016 Heard.

Earlier, the prayer for bail of the petitioner was twice rejected by this Court but while rejecting the bail petition of the petitioner vide order dated 16.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 4658 of 2016, this Court granted liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

The impugned order goes to show that charge against the petitioner was framed on 05.03.2016 and, after that, only one prosecution witness has been examined till the date of rejection order dated 30.03. 2016.

Petitioner is in jail custody since 29.06.2015 on the accusation of making attempt to commit rape on the informant. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18910 of 2016 (2) dt.10-08-2016 2/2 well as submissions of the parties, and also taking note of period of detention of the petitioner in jail custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Sessions Judge-V, Saran Chapra in connection with Garkha P.S.Case No. 130 of 2015 corresponding to Session trial no. 606 of 2015, subject to condition that if the petitioner makes any attempt to terrorize the prosecution witness or tamper with prosecution evidence, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after due and proper inquiry.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T