Ram Sundar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3548 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2022 Thana- SAKRI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Ram Sundar Yadav Son of Late Narayan Yadav R/V- Meghaul, P.S- Pandaul, Dist- Madhubani 2.
Bhikhari Yadav Son of Late Sridev Yadav R/V- Meghaul, P.S- Pandaul, DistMadhubani 3.
Bablu Yadav Son of Ram Sundar Yadav R/V- Meghaul, P.S- Pandaul, DistMadhubani ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Bhola Sadai Son of Baudhan Sadai R/V- Minhai, P.S- Sakri, DistMadhubani ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Md. Imtiyaz Ahmad, Mr. Mudit Meet, Advocates For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. Public Prosecutor For the R.No. 2 :
Mr. Bimal Kumar Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, respondent no. 2 and the State.
2. This appeal has been filed against the order dated 08.08.2022 passed by learned 1st Additional Sessions Judgecum-Special Judge SC/ST (POA) Act, Madhubani in Sakri P.S. Case No. 99 of 2022 registered under Sections 341, 323, 308, 379, 435/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, whereby the prayer for anticipatory bail of appellants has been rejected.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3548 of 2022(6) dt.09-04-2026 2/2
3. As per F.I.R., all the named accused persons, including these appellants, assaulted informant and his family member, abused informant by caste name. It is further alleged that the accused persons also set the house of informant on fire.
4. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that appellants are innocent and have committed no offence. Appellants have falsely been implicated in this case due to admitted land dispute. Allegation of abuse and assault is general and omnibus and there is no allegation of any specific overt act against the appellants. Appellants claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned counsel for respondent no. 2 vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that there is specific accusation that these appellants along with others abused informant and his family members by caste name, assaulted them and set the house on fire.
6. Considering the nature of accusation, I do not find any ground to interfere with the order of the learned court below and as such, the appeal, which has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail, is hereby rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T