← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./26697/2017bail granted

Harendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2017-06-30Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.26697 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2017 Thana -DHANGAI District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Harendra Singh Son of Late Dinanath Singh, Resident of Village- Kesari Tola, P.S.- Dhangain, District- Bhojpur (Ara). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Excise Cae No.164 of 2017 arising out of Dhangai P.S.Case No.15 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 188,323, 504, 353, 272 & 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Excise Amendment At, 2016. Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 'Kachcha Mahua' from the house of the petitioner, however, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has clean antecedent and he has remained in custody for about three months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of clean antecedent of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26697 of 2017 (2) dt.30-06-2017 2/2 the petitioner as well as the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District & Sessions Judge-IV, Ara, District- Bhojpur in connection with Excise Case No.164 of 2017 arising on Dhangai P.S.Case No.15 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U