Santosh Ramani @ Santosh Rawani v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22772 of 2017 (3) dt.30-06-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22772 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -274 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYA MUFFSIL District- GAYA ====================================================== Santosh Ramani @ Santosh Rawani Son of Late Dinesh Singh @ Ganesh Singh, Resident of Village- Lalganj, P.S. Belaganj, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Usha Kumari Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar -1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 30-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaya Muffasil P.S. Case No. 274 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegedly, six miscreants surrounded the motorcycle of the informant and pushed, resulting the informant and his wife fell down and after pointing out pistol the miscreants snatched Rs. 6,000/- from the informant besides driving license and also took away ladies purse from the wife of the informant containing some cash and ornaments. Thereafter, the miscreants started fleeing away towards Rajauli. The Police was informed and the miscreants were chased and thereafter, three miscreants were caught including the petitioner and from possession of the petitioner one live cartridge and looted cash of Rs. 6000/- were recovered.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22772 of 2017 (3) dt.30-06-2017 Submission is of false implication and that the first information report has been lodged after much delay, after registering Wazirganj P.S. Case No. 214 of 2016, the petitioner without any fault is suffering in custody since 20.07.2016 after his remand and as such the petitioner deserve sympathetic consideration. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that the looted cash was recovered from possession of the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Saffali Narayan, J. M. Ist Class, Gaya in connection with Muffasil (Gaya) P.S.

Case No. 274 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T