← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54531/2025bail granted

Vishi Kumar @ Vijanesh Kumar @ Bijanash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-13Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54531 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-625 Year-2025 Thana- ALAMGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Vishi Kumar @ Vijanesh Kumar @ Bijanash Kumar S/o- Indrajeet Mahto Village- Chheukia Terasia Ps- Ganga Bridge Dist- Vaishali 2.

Sharvan Mahto S/o- Rameshwar Mahto @ Ram Ishwar Mahto VillageChheukia Terasia Ps- Ganga Bridge Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs.Kritu Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vinod Shanker Modi, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in Alamganj P.S. case No. 625 of 2025 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that 210 liters liquor was recovered from E-rickshaw.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54531 of 2025(2) dt.13-08-2025 2/2 petitioners have got no concern with the E-rickshaw in question. It is further submitted that the petitioners were passersby of the way and have become victim of circumstances. The petitioners are in custody since 12.06.2025 and have got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S., 2023.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, clean antecedent and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.15,000/- (Fifteen thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Alamganj P.S. case No. 625 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Pankaj/- U T