Babita Devi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.39895 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -399 Year- 2017 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Babita Devi W/o Ramashankar Rawat @ Shankar Rawat

2. Champa Devi wife of Dudhan Rawat

3. Lovely Devi D/o Arun Rawat

4. Sunil Kumar Rawat @ Sunil Rawat @ Sumit Rawat son of Arun Rawat @ Kapildeo Rawat

5. Budhan Rawat son of Baleshwar Rawat All residents of Village - Agahra, P.S. Jamui, District - Jamui.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Parasar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Jamui P.S.Case No. 399 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and others, causing injuries to them. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is case and counter case between the parties, no specific allegation has been attributed against them and injuries are simple in nature, which will appear from Annexure-2.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39895 of 2018 (2) dt.10-07-2018 2/2 Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, named above, in the event of their arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Jamui P.S.Case No. 399 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U