Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57779/2024bail granted

Ravi Ranjan Singh @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar Singh @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-21Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57779 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2024 Thana- MAJORGANJ District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan Singh @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar Singh @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar Son of Late Shankar Singh R/V- Kuwari Madan @ Kuari Madan ward no. 6, P.S. Majorganj, Dist. Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmanand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 124 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1B)a, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

3. As per prosecution case, the police, on receipt of secret information, reached at the place of occurrence and apprehended two persons including the petitioner. The police has recovered arms and ammunition as well as one motorcycle without number plate from there and seizure list was prepared.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57779 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 2/3 against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged motorcycle though the same belongs to his sister. The petitioner has nothing to do with the affairs of the co-accused persons. The petitioner has also no concern with the seized arms and ammunition. The petitioner has six criminal antecedents and, in all of them, he is on bail as has been stated in Para-3 of the present bail application and is languishing in judicial custody since 13.04.2024 without any rhymes or reason.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also taking into account the period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Majorganj P.S. Case No. 124 of 2024 , subject to the following conditions; (i) One of the bailor(s) shall be the own/close family

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57779 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 3/3 members of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) rishi/- U T