← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55057/2022allowed

Shanti Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-15Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55057 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2022 Thana- MURAR District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Shanti Devi Wife Of Kashinath Sah Resident Of Village- Amsari, P.S.- Murar, District- Buxar 3.

Neetu Devi Wife Of Manoj Sah Resident Of Village- Amsari, P.S.- Murar, District- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Shankar Pathak, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects, if any, within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55057 of 2022(2) dt.15-12-2022 2/2 leveled against the petitioner. He submits that husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody and trial is going on. He submits that petitioner No. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioner No. 2 is gotni of the deceased. He submits that deceased has committed suicide by hanging on roof in closed door room which is also clear from the postmortem report. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Murar P.S. Case No. 59 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) guddukr/- U T