← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53937/2019bail granted

Manju Kumari @ Smt. Manju Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-06Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53937 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1997 Year-2017 Thana- SARAN COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSaran ====================================================== 1.

Manju Kumari @ Smt. Manju Devi, Wife of Anil Mahto, Resident of Village- Gangati, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali. 2.

Basmati Devi @ Smt. Basmati Devi, Wife of Ramprit Mahto, Resident of House No. E-36, Road No. 13, Near Children Park, Patratu Tharmal Power Station, P.S.- Patratu, District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand). 3.

Ramprit Mahto @ Thagan Mahto, Son of Late Dhanu Mahto, Resident of House No. E-36, Road No. 13, Near Children Park, Patratu Tharmal Power Station, P.S.- Patratu, District- Ramgarh (Jharkhand). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Dimpi @ Dimpal Kumari, Wife of Sandeep Kumar Ranjan, Daughter of Sarbjeet Sinha Resident of Village and Post Office- Anjani, P.S.- Parsa, District- Saran.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nachiketa Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 1997 of 2017, registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The accusation is of torturing of complainantopposite party no.2 by her husband and in-laws due to non-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53937 of 2019(5) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 fulfillment of demand of dowry and removing from her matrimonial house.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are married Nanad, mother-in-law and father-in-law of the complainant-opposite party no. 2 and they have falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M., Chapra, in connection with Complaint Case No. 1997 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T