Ramdeo Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51061 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2017 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya ====================================================== RAMDEO RAM, Male, aged about 70 years, Son of Late Deonandan Ram, Resident of Village- Banshi Bigha, Police Station- Belaganj, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party :
Mr.Arun Kumar Singh, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 04.07.2019 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 409, 420, 465 and 468 of the IPC.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that Chalitar Ravidas, Bibha Devi and Reena Devi have taken benefit of 'Indira Awas Yojna' twice. Upon which, B.D.O. of Atari Block, filed petition before Atari Police Station to lodge case against the aforesaid three persons Chalitar Ravidas, Bibha Devi and Reena Devi.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51061 of 2019(2) dt.20-08-2019 2/2 witnesses alleged against the petitioner. He has already superannuated from the service. The petitioner is aged about 70 years old. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. His name has come in the present case during the course of investigation. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) only in the learned court below which shall be subject to final outcome of the case.
On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner is directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) only in the learned court below which shall be subject to final outcome of the case. On doing so, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.- 10th, Gaya, in connection with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No. 40 of 2017.
(Sudhir Singh, J) U.K./- U T