Bare Lal Murmua v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19984 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2005 Thana -SANGRAMPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================

1. Bare Lal Murmua Son of Late Budhu Murmu resident of village- Dangra, P.S.- Sangrampur (Tetiya Bambar O.P.), District- Munger .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indra Kumar Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 04-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 06.11.2015 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 32018 of 2015 on the ground that the trial has not been concluded within the stipulated period and the petitioner is suffering in custody since 13.04.2015 whereas other co-accused who have faced trial have already been acquitted and others have been granted bail by the learned court below itself. It is submitted that up till now, one prosecution witness has been examined and in near future, trial is not likely to be concluded.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19984 of 2016 (2) dt.04-05-2016 2/2 petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Munger in connection with S.T.No. 173/2015 arising out of Sangrampur (Telia Bambar) P.S. Case No. 90 of 2005, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) ajaypd./- U T