Virun Singh @ Surat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.36629 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -166 Year- 2018 Thana -FATUHA District- PATNA ====================================================== Virun Singh @ Surat, Son of Late Rampyare Singh, resident of Supan Chak, P.S. Fatuha, District- Patna.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Shankar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Fatuha P.S. Case No. 166 of 2018 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 504, 427, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.
It has been submitted that petitioner and informant are own brothers. The altercation has taken place because of property dispute.
In the written report it is apparent that informant has not received any injury. It is mentioned in paragraph-3 of the bail petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.36629 of 2018 (3) dt.13-07-2018 2/2 event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 166 of 2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Sabita Rani, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna City, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,
(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- Rohit Kr.
U T