Tulshi Prasad Chouhan @ Tulshi Chouhan @ Veer Pratap Chouhan @ Tulshi Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50834 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ====================================================== TULSHI PRASAD CHOUHAN @ TULSHI CHOUHAN @ VEER PRATAP CHOUHAN @ TULSHI PRASAD Son of Late Jageshwar Chouhan Resident of Gere Chiraiyatard, P.S.- Mufassil, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Suman Kumari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 16-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in Mufassil P.S. Case No. 92 of 2019, disclosing offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

In view of the Full Bench decision rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2019(2) PLJR 1089, this application cannot be maintained and is accordingly dismissed. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If he does so, his application for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by rejection of the present application for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) arun/- U