Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61263/2024dismissed

Sajid Ahamad Khan @ Shabnam Khan v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-05Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61263 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2024 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Sajid Ahamad Khan @ Shabnam Khan S/o Late Quasim Khan Resident of Village- Milan Toldih, P.S Keoti, District - Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Savitesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Keoti P.S. Case No. 177 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Petitioner is said to have taken lift from the informant and after some distance, he assaulted him by means of lathi sustaining grievous injury to him and looted away his belongings.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the injury report does not support the prosecution case. Petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61263 of 2024(2) dt.05-10-2024 2/2 three criminal antecedents.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the informant has sustained grievous injury. He further submitted that the petitioner has three criminal antecedents and all are almost similar nature of the offence. Hence, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case, the nature of the allegation and the criminal antecedent, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

7. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail, the learned Court below would pass order in accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T