Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58366 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2023 Thana- PIPRA District- Supaul ====================================================== Ramesh Kumar @ Ramesh Sharma S/O Polay Sharma R/O Village- Lalpatti, P.S- Pipra, Distt.- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amrit Abhijat, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 245/2023 lodged on 28.07.2023 under Section 302/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, F.I.R. has been lodged against five named accused persons including the present petitioner with allegation that all accused persons in connivance with each other killed the daughter of the informant who is the wife of accused Rejeev Sharma.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Counsel also submits that the present case has been lodged under Section 304B read with Section 302/34 of the I.P.C. From bare reading

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58366 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/2 of the F.I.R., it transpires that the petitioner is not the family member and he is the stranger and there is no eye witnesses of the occurrence. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the co-villager and basically stranger to the deceased family and he has nothing to do with the internal family members of the deceased. He name has been figured in this case only and only due to the reason that he is the neighbour. Counsel further submits that the criminal antecedent of the petitioner is clean.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. As such, considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest of surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 4 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 30,000/- (Thirty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

(Dr. Anshuman, J) Sunnykr/- U