Arun Mahato v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20683 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2015 Thana -DHANGAI District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Arun Mahato, Son of Ramchandra Mahto, Resident of Village- Sheopur, Police Station Dhangai in the district of Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kr Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Dhangai P.S. Case No. 65 of 2015, registered under Section 376 and 511 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of POCSO Act. The accusation is of enticing away the minor daughter of the informant by this petitioner in the evening of 27.12.2015. On raising alarm, neighbourers rushed there and this petitioner succeeded in fleeing away.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would appear from the F.I.R. that no any attempt was made by this petitioner to commit rape on victim. Further submission is that, in fact, petitioner is neighbour of the informant has falsely
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20683 of 2016 (2) dt.16-05-2016 2/2 been implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. The petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody since 15.01.2016.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the 1st Addl. District and Sessions Judge-cumSpecial Judge, POCSO, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with POCSO-01 of 2016 arising out of Dhangai P.S. Case No. 65 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the parents/close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T