Ruhela Ansari @ Ruhel Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.1196 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -97 Year- 2016 Thana -VIJAYPUR District- GOPALGANJ ======================================================

1. Ruhela Ansari @ Ruhel Ansari Son of Late Dukhi Ansari, Resident of Village-Ghat Bandhaura, Chhitauna Tola, Police Station-Vijaipur, DistrictGopalganj. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sri Sadanand Paswan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-07-2017 The appellant seeks regular bail in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354(A), 504/34 Indian Penal Code 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(i) (x) of SC/ST Act.

It has been submitted on behalf of the appellant that allegation of outraging the modesty of the informant is against the son of the informant and only allegation against this appellant is that when informant and others came to the appellant to complain about the deeds of his son, he abused them and except that there is nothing against the appellant. Further appellant has been in judicial custody since 18.02.2017.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation and the period of

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1196 of 2017 (4) dt.03-07-2017 2/2 custody, this appeal is allowed, let the appellant above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Gopalganj, in connection with Vijaipur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the appellant shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The appellant will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The appellant shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T