Kaushal Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31677 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2017 Thana -NAWADA MUFFASIL District- NAWADA ======================================================
1. Kaushal Yadav son of Sakal Yadav.
2. Sanjay Yadav son of Sadhu Yadav.
3. Nageshwar Yadav son of Devnandan Yadav. All are Resident of VillagePokharpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-06-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 113 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and others by various arms causing injuries to them. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is case and counter case between the parties and though there is allegation of assault, however, injuries caused to them was found to be simple in nature except one, which was inflicted to Arjun Yadav.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31677 of 2018 (3) dt.27-06-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 113 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T