Rajendra Prasad Singh v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.39 of 2015 In LPA 1233 of 2014 ====================================================== Rajendra Prasad Singh. Son of Late Bindeshwari Prasad Singh. Resident of village and P.O.- Jaitpur, Police Station - Barahiya, District - Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner.
Versus
1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Delhi.
2. The Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, New Delhi.
3. The Commissioner, Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi - 110067.
4. The joint Commissioner (Administration), Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan, New Delhi - 110016.
5. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Murari Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, GA- 3 Opp. Party Nos. 3 & 4 : Mr. G. K. Agrawal, Advocate Mr. K. Ravish, Advocate For Union of India : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 28-04-2016 Heard Mr. Murari Prasad Sinha, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, learned Government Advocate No.-3 for the State. Also heard Mr. G. K. Agrawal, learned Counsel for Opposite Party Nos. 3 & 4, and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Verma, learned Central Government Counsel for Union of India.
Learned counsel for the review petitioner seeks
Patna High Court C. REV. No.39 of 2015 (6) dt.28-04-2016 2/2 permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court with appropriate application in future. No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
(I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.) Uday/- U